Planning
Commission Minutes
MINUTES
Cascade Charter Township Planning Commission
Monday, June 20, 2005
7:00 p.m.
ARTICLE 1. Chairman Goldberg called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m.
Members Present: Goldberg, Koessel, Lewis, Logue, MacAllister,
McDonald, Postma, Richards, Robinson.
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Planning Director Peterson, Planner Deem, Admin.
Assistant Hern and approximately fifteen (15) members of the public.
ARTICLE 2. Chairman Goldberg led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
ARTICLE 3. Chairman Goldberg requested motion for approval of the
June 20th agenda. Member Robinson motioned for approval of the agenda,
supported by Member Richards. The motion carried.
ARTICLE 4. Member Lewis requested on page 3 (three) of the June 6,
2005 minutes under his statements regarding term limitations, he would
like added to the minutes, his list of explanations. Items included:
1) The Board should be based on performance.
2) Four (4) years is a good amount of time to become familiar with
term.
3) Other governments, except for Ada and Grand Rapids, do not have
limitations.
4) The Chairmanship changes every two (2) years.
5) Eventual openings on the Planning Commission and Zoning Board will
allow for new individuals.
Member Lewis also thought Member MacAllister had some reasons
regarding her statements that were not listed. Member MacAllister
noted she would like her comments added as well and will forward them
to the secretary.
Member Lewis moved to accept the Minutes of June 6, 2005 with
additions from he and Member MacAllister on page three (3), supported
by Member McDonald. The motion carried.
ARTICLE 5. Receive and File: Chairman Goldberg stated the Zoning
Board of Appeals Minutes for May 10, 2005 have been received and
filed.
ARTICLE 6. Case #05-2734: Tony Gunden
(PUBLIC HEARING)
The applicant requested a Type 1 Special Use Permit to construct a 30'
x 40' accessory building at 8350 Grand River Drive.
Planner Deem related this is a 1,200 square foot accessory building
and the Township ordinances allow for one (1) accessory building. He
noted the applicant currently has an accessory building on the
property and the building will be removed prior to construction from
the property. Planner Deem said the building is 100 feet from the side
yard and approximately 100 feet from the rear yard and the height of
the proposed building is 16'4" feet at the midpoint. A building
with these setbacks would be allowed to have a height of 22 feet and
will be hard to see, due to the woods, from Grand River Drive. He also
stated the building's exterior will match the residence and have vinyl
siding.
Planner Deem noted Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the Special Use request for the construction of the accessory
building with the following conditions:
1) The building is not involved, directly or indirectly with any
business, trade, occupation or profession.
2) Any lighting for the building would be downcast.
Member MacAllister asked for the other elevations of the project
and asked where the driveway will connect and Planner Deem said he
wasn't sure; hasn't been proposed yet.
Applicant Tony Gunden said the building would look exactly like the
house with the same roof pitch. He addressed Member MacAllister's
question regarding the driveway and said he may cut through the yard.
He noted the building would be used for storage, as he is a contractor
and he and his wife collect antiques.
Member MacAllister asked where they would drive into the barn and
Applicant Gunden described on the plans.
Chairman Goldberg noted the lighting is not shown on the plans.
Applicant Gunden said he doesn't have any planned at this time and if
any is added, it will match the house. Chairman Goldberg asked the
applicant to note that if lighting is added, it must be downcast.
Member Lewis noted to say there's an elevation at the property is
an understatement and noted how lovely their current building is.
Member Lewis asked the applicant what his plans are for the original
building. Applicant Gunden noted plans are currently being made for it
to be moved to another home.
Member Lewis supported by Member Koessel moved to open the public
hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was opened.
Amy Mannor, resident at 1651 Highgrove, asked where the new
building will be located in relation to her house and if she'll be
able to see it. Applicant Gunden said the building will be closer to
the toboggan hill that's located near their properties and he doubts
she'll be able to see it even during the winter months. Resident
Mannor questioned if the building is for storage only; noting her
concern hearing sawing and hammering since he's a contractor.
Applicant Gunden reassured her the new building is for storage only.
Member Robinson supported by Member MacAllister moved to close the
public hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was closed.
Planner Deem related a couple of phone calls were received
regarding the project but were inquiries only.
Member Koessel supported by Member McDonald moved to approve the
applicant's request for a Type I Special Use Permit to construct a 30'
x 40' accessory building at 8350 Grand River Drive noting:
1) The Applicant cannot utilize the building with any business, trade,
occupation or profession.
2) If lighting is added, must be downcast.
Member Robinson added another condition:
3) The first building must be removed prior to construction of the new
building.
The motion carried.
ARTICLE 7. Case #05-2700: Kraft Street Partners
(PUBLIC HEARING)
The applicant requested to change the zoning classification from B2
Commercial to Planned Unit Development to allow for the construction
of a new personal service store at 5703 28th Street.
Planning Director Peterson began by clarifying that the personal
service store means this building would be a hair salon. He described
the location on the North side of 28th Street between Gordon Food
Service and Chatam Woods and the property consists of 7.5 acres. He
noted 28th Street would serve as an entrance and the location of the
building is on the east side of the vacant property. The building
would be approximate 6,500 square feet and the plans do show a
possible future expansion but the rest of the site is to remain vacant
until they have a proposed use. Planning Director Peterson noted the
site is bounded by the residential use to the north (Chatwick Hills)
and the developer has proposed a landscape screen to match what was
done at Betten Auto in this area. This landscape buffer is 40 feet
wide and landscaped with trees, shrubs and evergreens. The developer
plans on continuing the berm along the north property line that was
started by Betten Auto, the berm is about 2-3 feet high with plantings
along the top. Planning Director Peterson also noted the plans do not
indicate what type of Spruce trees are going in and Staff has
recommended the Colorado Blue Spruce that will also match Betten Auto.
Planning Director Peterson also stated the developer has also
designed their lighting plan to meet the Township's standards as well
as limited the height of the light poles to 200 feet high for those
that are within 200 feet of the north property line.
He also noted the plans include completion of the access road from
Kraft through to the light at Charlevoix and 28th Street. Planning
Director Peterson noted the Planning Commission would need to decide
how much of the service drive should be constructed at this time
saying that Staff would like to see the service drive constructed to
the west side of phase 1 of this project, thus completing the drive
when the remainder of the land is developed. He noted this would avoid
the conflicts with Gordon Food Service and would also avoid having to
relocate the access to Kraft in the future if a more advisable
location is available. Planning Director Peterson noted that some of
the Board may remember the most recent addition to the Design One
salon to the south. This plan included the revised entrance off from
28th Street as shown on the plans. The proposed project is purchasing
the entrance and will be included in the new PUD. These plans are
consistent with what was presented at the time of the Design One
addition. The legal issues regarding the access drive and the property
owner to the east, Esplanade, have now been addressed and incorporated
into the project as proposed. Planning Director Peterson noted
Esplande has part of structure on the developer's property and they're
trying to work out the details. He also noted that if the additional
property is acquired, the developer would be able to add two (2) more
buildings to the parcel, ordinance states one (1) building per three
(3) acres.
Planning Director Peterson also reported the storm water design
shows a detention pond in the northwest corner of the site. The
detention pond is designed for the entire site if developed. It is
also being located in a spot that would provide additional buffer to
the residential use to the north. The final design will have to be
approved by the Township Engineer. It is also being located in a spot
that would provide additional buffer to the residential use to the
north. The final design would have to be approved by the Township
Engineer.
The developer also plans to create a boulevard from 28th Street if
the court settles in his favor of purchasing the area from Design One.
The developer has investigated providing sidewalk into the site from
28th Street and appears that there is not enough space for a sidewalk
from 28th Street into the site and noted sidewalks would hamper the
landscaping and Staff suggested a sidewalk connection from Kraft Ave.
when the access to Kraft is created. Sidewalk could also be along the
Kraft Ave. frontage.
Planning Director Peterson noted the applicant does plan on placing
a small sign inside the new median at the 28th Street entrance. Their
plan indicates a sign 9 feet tall and 40 square feet total. This would
be smaller than other pole signs in the area and would be used to
indicate the addresses of this project as well as the property behind
Betten Auto. He noted the Waterfall Shoppes is limited to five (5)
feet high and sixty (60) square feet and suggested using those same
limitations for this sign. He also said this would be consistent with
other directional signs the Planning Commission has approved in the
past and the applicant has not indicated the desire for any
modifications to signage allowances.
Planning Director Peterson noted the elevation plan indicates that
the building is twenty-two (22) feet tall.
Planning Director Peterson said the property is Master Planned
Commercial and the use being proposed would be consistent with that
designation as well as the current Commercial Zoning. He also noted
the other acreage would be under PUD amendment and the developer would
have to attend public hearings for each building.
Planning Director Peterson said the Chatwick Hills Association held
a Board Meeting on June 16th regarding the project and Staff has not
heard from the association.
Planning Director Peterson summarized that the rezoning conditions,
according to Section 16.03.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, must be met.
Chairman Goldberg expressed his concern for a couple of spots in
the plans (parking and the bend in the service drive) where car
headlights may point into the homes of the residents. Planning
Director Peterson said the north property line will be heavily
landscaped and the Township's ultimate goal would be to have the
service drive exit straight out to Kraft Avenue. He also questioned if
his interpretation of the PUD was correct by asking if the applicant
needs to request an amendment for each phase of the project on the
property. Planning Director Peterson confirmed the applicant does need
to come before the Planning Commission for each phase of their
project, only one (1) building per three (3) acres.
Member McDonald asked if there are any designated swamps or
wetlands on the property and the applicant said there is nothing
designated. Member McDonald also asked if the applicant plans to clear
some of the extensive overgrowth and Planning Director Peterson said
the buffer area will be thinned out and has already been done once.
Member Koessel asked if the storm sewer would be put in right away
and Planning Director Peterson noted that it would be for at least the
first building. Planning Director Peterson noted the sewer would
require revisions for the proposed service drive and for Gordon Food
Service. He further explained that Gordon Food Service has a very
elaborate system that has an underground retention pond. The other
businesses in the area have drains to the parcel but no formal
retention pond has been installed, this project would help the area
and its businesses. Member Koessel noted that nothing has been
formally agreed upon regarding the retention pond and Planning
Director Peterson said the language for the retention pond would be in
the PUD ordinance.
Member MacAllister expressed her concern regarding Phase II of the
project and the retention pond and the applicant needing to move it
after Phase II has been completed. Member MacAllister noted it would
be helpful if the plans included the retention pond. Planning Director
Peterson noted this is a great opportunity for the Planning Commission
to address issues such as this. Member MacAllister noted her concern
with additional buildings on the parcel and thought the retention pond
may be better located towards Kraft Ave. She also questioned the
boulevard as part of this project or is the sidewalk the
responsibility of Design One? Planning Director Peterson said the road
already exists but it is not a boulevard as the applicant has
submitted on the plans, the boulevard is part of the plans for this
project. Member MacAllister asked if the center islands were not done,
could additional sidewalks be done. Planning Director Peterson noted
Staff has reviewed the width of the area and, in his opinion; there is
no room for sidewalks.
Member MacAllister questioned if the service drive would open up
behind Betten Autos since they're currently parking vehicles on the
drive. Planning Director Peterson confirmed that the vehicles would
have to be moved if the connection is made, yes, Betten Autos has to
restore the service drive to allow for traffic.
Planning Director Peterson noted that Staff believes this project
meets the requirements for rezoning to PUD since the property is
already zoned and Master Planned commercial and the use is consistent
with those designations. He also said the plan includes the
appropriate buffers to the north residential properties and provides
for the access drive connections to Kraft. Staff recommends approval
of the plan with the following conditions:
1) Approval of the final storm water plans by the Township Engineer.
2) Show the 2-3 foot high landscape berm along the north property
line.
3) Indicate that the evergreens on site will be Colorado Blue Spruce.
4) Revise the Identification sign to a limit of five (5) feet high and
sixty (60) square feet.
5) Include in the PUD Ordinance that when phase 2 is developed, it
come in for an amendment to the PUD.
He also noted that if the Planning Commission approves the plan for
the development, it would come back with the PUD Ordinance that would
regulate the project for a recommendation to the Township Board.
Mark Harmsen of Kraft St. Partners provided answers to some of the
question of the Planning Commission. He noted the landscape buffer
will be ninety-five (95) feet with Chatwick Hills along the north side
of the property, this buffer is to be installed and approximately four
(4) to five (5) feet tall, alleviating headlights from traffic and
parking.
He also noted that the property was surveyed and there are no
designated wetlands on the land. The project has a storm drain along
the south and a ditch is already there and used by Burger King, Design
One and other businesses. Harmsen noted the retention pond would be
done with the first building and the businesses will share in the cost
of the drain.
Harmsen also noted that the applicant has been in litigation with
Design One for the past 1 ½ years regarding their twenty (20) feet
along the proposed boulevard and what would be removed.
Member MacAllister questioned the type of landscaping for the
boulevard and if it were shrunk, could sidewalks be added. Harmsen
noted that by shrinking the boulevard, it would make the drive on and
off 28th Street very narrow and needs to be this wide to allow for
traffic.
Harmsen noted that Gordon Food Service has Township easement
requirements to access drive to Kraft and the service drive would be
completed in phase two (2) of the project. He noted they are working
with Gordon Food Service to purchase an agreement for power drain
easements. If the purchase goes through, the developers would like to
open the service dive up and eliminate the bend in the drawings
towards Kraft and bring the service drive straight through,
eliminating the bend, and the drive would line-up across from the
Meijer service drive. Harmsen noted this is the developer's goal and
the Township supports this goal.
Harmsen noted that Allstate would also have enough property to add
another, third, building and Betten Auto supports Phase I of the
plans.
Member McDonald asked where the telephone pole and where the wires
connect to. Harmsen said the pole and wires were utilized by an old
service building that is no longer there, the wires are dead. Member
McDonald asked if they would be clear-cutting all the property or just
the site for Phase I. Harmsen noted the area has been clear-cut once
already with the exception of the north buffer; they could do it all
now, hasn't been discussed.
Harmsen also reported he spoke with the association and their issue
was that the service road could not go across the north property line;
developer has agreed. He also noted that Sundance Grill is infringing
upon their easement rights and are working with them for an agreement.
Member MacAllister said she is trying to allow for pedestrians to
walk into the area and asked if consideration is being give to
sidewalk to Kraft since there is already a partial walk there. Harmsen
noted that sidewalks may be considered when the entire service drive
is done but at this time, not part of the plans.
Member Koessel supported by Member MacAllister moved to open the
public hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was opened.
Cathleen Stahl of the Chatwick Board speaking as representative
summarized the plans as described above. She noted the association has
concerns regarding the retention pond that's already there and more
asphalt being laid; residents are experiencing flooding in their
backyards and basements currently and will this add to their problems?
She also asked if a review has been done of the springs in the area.
The association also wonders if privacy fencing may be added along the
line and on the east end of the property, noting Betten has chain link
fencing. Harmsen replied by saying the issue of increased flooding
should actually dissipate with the project since a retention pond will
be installed. He noted that the businesses have sewers that go out to
the land, but there is no retention pond, the water just runs out into
the property. He also said the developer would consider privacy
fencing along the property line and Betten will have to move their
current fencing closer to their property once the service road is
opened. Stahl noted the association is requesting privacy fencing
because in the winter, headlights do shine into their bedrooms and
living rooms.
Member McDonald asked if the residential flooding problems began
when Betten Auto was built and Stahl said it has happened and
increased over time. Harmsen noted that there is a high water table in
that area and would be happy to have the engineer check water. He also
said they would consider moving the pond to the south and when it is
built, will include four (4) other businesses to utilize excluding
Gordon Food Service. Harmsen said the four (4) businesses currently
empty into the ditch and are unregulated; the project would help the
water problems.
Harmsen also said the fence along the service drive should not be a
problem and they are willing to work with the association, the
developer installed one for residents out in Grandville for a
different project and doesn't foresee any problems.
Member Lewis asked if the address would be a 28th Street address
and Harmsen stated yes and are approaching the County for address
changes from 5757 28th Street to 5753, which is available.
Planner Deem related a few phone calls were received, callers were
asking questions but no opposition received.
Member Robinson supported by Member MacAllister moved to close the
public hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was closed.
Member Koessel motioned for approval of the project noting the six
(6) Staff recommendations already outlined and adding the following
recommendations:
7) Privacy fence to be erected along north property line and Developer
to work with the President or Representative from the Association.
8) Open service drive by Betten Auto
9) Service road to stop at Gordon Food Service and completing service
road to be included with Phase 2.
Member Postma supported the motion.
Member Robinson questioned if the spring study should be included
in phase 1 and member Koessel believes the engineers will review the
area for water. Planning Director Peterson said he would speak with
the engineer regarding the springs.
Member Lewis noted that in order to protect the high paying owners
on 28th Street, the developer understands there are to be no
off-premise signs. Harmsen acknowledged Member Lewis' statement and
noted they will hopefully own part of the easement once the court
settlement has been closed.
Member MacAllister said she would like to see the owner work on
sidewalks for the area and to continue working with Staff and the
Township's sidewalks.
Member McDonald asked for the buffer to be noted as a ninety-five
foot buffer versus the forty-foot buffer, Planning Director Peterson
will write in.
Member Lewis called to question the motion on the floor. All Board
Members in favor with MacAllister opposed. Motion carried.
ARTICLE 8. Case #05-2728 Barnes Management
(PUBLIC HEARING)
Applicant is requesting to change the zoning classification from R1
Residential to PUD to allow for the construction of an office building
at 1544 MacNider.
Planning Director Peterson said the area is in the southeast corner
of MacNider and Cascade Rd. and is approximately two (2) acres and
noted Watermark is zoned PUD. He noted the site is the result of the
applicant's desire to acquire two (2) different properties; together
these properties make up two (2) acres. One property is a small strip
of land that is actually part of a much larger parcel and by itself,
would not be a permitted parcel. He also related the residentially
zoned properties in this area total approximately six (6) acres. If
the project proceeds, there will be about four (4) acres left as
residential. Staff has always indicated that if any rezoning were to
take place in this area, it should include all of the properties in
order to better plan for the area. This would help provide better
buffering to adjacent land uses and ensure that the uses would be
compatible to those being proposed.
The building being proposed is for 10,000 square feet that the
applicant would own and occupy half the building, leaving the other
half for future use. The lower buildings have a 25-foot buffer and no
parking will be along the front along Cascade Road. Planning Director
Peterson also said the Kent County Road Commission has been contacted
regarding the driveway location and Staff has not heard from them if
acceptable. The project still meets the Cascade Road Corridor Plan.
He also said discussions have been held regarding adding a center
left turn lane on Cascade Road and is being considered by the
developer. He also said a traffic study has been done and this
building would not warrant a center left lane but the next building
would.
Planning Director Peterson stated Staff has reviewed the project
and is not consistent with Master Plan and would have a negative
impact on residential and the south side doe not meet the required
buffer.
Chairman Goldberg questioned if applicant indicated willingness to
be compliant with issues and Planning Director Peterson said they
haven't spoken regarding specifics, need to re-zone the parcel first.
Planning Director Peterson stated that Staff recommends denial of
the rezoning as proposed since it doe not meet the standards for PUD
rezoning. He noted that if the Planning Commission does not agree with
Staff then it is suggested that they describe how they have met each
of the rezoning standards and table the site plan in order to have the
following items addressed:
1) Require a center turn lane on Cascade Road.
2) Final storm water design plans.
3) Removal of the southern drive on the site plan.
4) A complete signage plan for the building.
5) Require the building to be downsized to only accommodate the
applicant's needs since they will be occupying only half the building.
6) Provide a lighting plan in compliance with Township standards.
Jeff Barnes of Barnes Management showed the buffer area under
discussion and their plan to move the south drive up, these were
changed per the engineer's request and noted the retention pond an
lights are not to shine onto adjacent property. Barnes showed the
additional buffer and landscape that provides more than the Township
requires. He noted they're trying to create an inviting area and the
offices would be located along Cascade Road and keep the residential
along the golf course. Barnes also said they have worked to comply
with Township Staff and the issue regarding the south drive is to
provide an easement. He also noted they are working with neighbors of
the property, the owner and Township Staff and cannot control
development of other parcels. Barnes noted he is a Township resident
and wants to stay here and also noted signage and lighting would meet
PUD requirements.
Member Lewis supported by Member McDonald moved to open the public
hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was opened.
Mike Johnson, property owner of 1544 Cascade Rd., stated he doesn't
approve of the rezoning. The homes in the area are smaller homes and
purpose is to have someone buy it should owners decide to sell. The
owners around the site were never told anything regarding the other
parcels.
Dave Shaffer, property owner of 5610 Cascade Rd., said he is not
opposed to the building if an easement is installed to allow for
proper ingress and egress into the building.
Mark Bremer, property owner of 5630 Cascade Rd., said it probably
wouldn't be possible to group all the parcels together and what is
being proposed now, isn't the best.
Lynn Rocca, property owner of 1594 MacNider, said they are trying
to sell their vacant house and there is no interest in the home
because of a sign that notes property as "Possible
Commercial". She is opposed to the rezoning.
Terry Westbrook, property owner of 5673 Far Hill (representing
Tommy Ray of 1588 MacNider), doesn't want the office going up, his
property has been on the market quite some time and asked the Planning
Commission for a resolution to this issue so folks can move on with
their lives.
Tommy Ray, property owner of 1588 MacNider, noted the site of the
project is 1.8 acres and could blend in the back with landscaping but
noted cars along the property within 25-feet and opposes the project.
Planner Deem noted one letter was received and included within the
Planning Commission's packets.
Member Robinson moved and member Lewis supported closing the public
hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was closed.
Member Lewis noted that there seems to be two (2) issues being
presented, rezoning and the site plan, and the Planning Commission
needs to make a recommendation to the Township. He noted that the
property owners have a right to make money on their property. He also
noted that Cascade Road was developed to move traffic but doesn't want
to see it developed like the East Beltline nor 28th Street and there
are lots of R1 in Watermark and Manchester Hills along Cascade. He
sees the advantages to the owners and developers as well. Member Lewis
stated he would vote against the project.
Member Richards said she agrees with Member Lewis and the project
is good for Barnes Management and has financial benefit with the
owners. She also noted that Mr. Ray's letter is very compelling in
denying the project but is from his own personal interest. Member
Richards noted the Township does not have a benefit for approving the
project and further noted that new homes are being built along Cascade
Road. She would vote against the project.
Member Robinson stated he agrees with the other two (2) Planning
Commissioners and supports Staff in denying the rezoning to PUD.
Member Koessel noted the Spaulding property that has a church is in
R1 residential and the credit union that was built is actually part in
Ada and part Cascade. He noted the property is worth more as
residential as long as zoned R1, he believes the rezoning is not in
their best interest.
Chairman Goldberg noted the parcels and the two (2) acres for the
building includes a panhandle that is not natural. This panhandle
impacts adjoining properties to allow for mix-use development and to
piece-meal together the acreage. He noted it makes no sense and is
against it.
Member Lewis motioned to deny PUD rezoning of 1544 MacNider Avenue
supported by Member MacAllister.
Member Logue asked if all property owners are for rezoning, what
happens if one (1) property owner is opposed; how would they request
rezoning? Member Koessel noted that there are six (6) acres of land
and all neighbors would have to request rezoning as PUD, if one (1)
opposes rezoning, it will not happen. Planning Director Peterson noted
that each case would have to be dependent on the project and there is
only one (1) standard and that is in order to control a single entity;
would need to meet minimum requirements.
All were in favor of denying the PUD rezoning of 1544 MacNider
Avenue. Motion carried.
ARTICLE 9. Case #04-2694: Trane of West Michigan
Applicant is requesting site plan approval for a new 79,000-square
foot building on lots 29 and 30 of the Meadowbrooke Business Park.
Planning Director Peterson opened with the project has the same
conditions as before and has been reviewed by Meadowbrook Association.
Brent Shoemaker, representing the applicant, said he has nothing to
add.
Member Koessel motioned for approval with support from Member
McDonald to approve the site plan for a new 79,000 square foot
building on lots 29 and 30 of the Meadowbrooke Business Park.
All in favor of approval, none opposed. Motion carried.
ARTICLE 10. Any Other Business
Member Koessel said the Township had two (2) town meetings
regarding the Burton Street sewer project and the Township Board was
applauded and supported regarding the project. The sewer serves Burton
Street and lower lavatories will be connected to the new sewer. A
meeting was also held with Pineridge Wednesday night and everyone
supported the project.
Member Koessel also noted that the recommended term limits will not
be on this Wednesday's Township Board's agenda and encouraged the
Planning Commission to attend the meeting when the Township Board
reviews it; it will be a tough sell.
Member McDonald asked if the streetlights were reviewed and
complimented the Township Board in handling the sewer project.
Member MacAllister said she noticed Walgreen's took their sign
down.
ARTICLE 11. Adjournment
Member Robinson supported by Member McDonald moved to adjourn. The
motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tom McDonald, Secretary
TMD:LH
Government
~ Departments ~
Community
Business ~
Reference Desk ~
What's Happening
Help ~
Home ~ Search ~ Site Map
Comments? Feedback? Questions? Click here to send an email.
Site Use Policy
This page last modified
06/08/04.
All information © 2003-2004Cascade Township, Michigan
|
Site
Design/Development by
 |
|
